<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHP Includes for Non-Developers</title>
	<atom:link href="/blog/php-includes-for-non-developers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bretglassett.com/blog/php-includes-for-non-developers</link>
	<description>A blog for and about web design and web development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:46:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-beta2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.bretglassett.com/blog/php-includes-for-non-developers/comment-page-1#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretglassett.com/blog/?p=26#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Hey David. The reason why I say it is better for smaller sites is that, in my opinion, larger sites (30+ pages) that you do not want to maintain should be built on some CMS platform. That is the only reason - the includes will work great on a 100+ page site if the client does not wish to implement a CMS.

Cheers,
B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey David. The reason why I say it is better for smaller sites is that, in my opinion, larger sites (30+ pages) that you do not want to maintain should be built on some CMS platform. That is the only reason &#8211; the includes will work great on a 100+ page site if the client does not wish to implement a CMS.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.bretglassett.com/blog/php-includes-for-non-developers/comment-page-1#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretglassett.com/blog/?p=26#comment-87</guid>
		<description>thanks for the fast response bret! im setting up a store for my cousins shop, there could be a good 100+ plus pages worth of products but im using romancart rather than complicated e-commerce software. i noticed you say its useful for  &quot;smaller html websites&quot; however mine is going to end up large but i just want it to be easy to update the header area, sidebar and footer in one file as opposed to editing hundreds. you think this technique will work ok for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the fast response bret! im setting up a store for my cousins shop, there could be a good 100+ plus pages worth of products but im using romancart rather than complicated e-commerce software. i noticed you say its useful for  &#8220;smaller html websites&#8221; however mine is going to end up large but i just want it to be easy to update the header area, sidebar and footer in one file as opposed to editing hundreds. you think this technique will work ok for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.bretglassett.com/blog/php-includes-for-non-developers/comment-page-1#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretglassett.com/blog/?p=26#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Depends - if the meta is identical for each page then you will want to keep it in the included file where the rest of your head tags are. If this info needs to be different for each page then no, you will need to leave the head tags on each of the pages. This also applies to page titles; if you want to have each page with a separate title you need to be sure the title tags are left on each page. 

Bret</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends &#8211; if the meta is identical for each page then you will want to keep it in the included file where the rest of your head tags are. If this info needs to be different for each page then no, you will need to leave the head tags on each of the pages. This also applies to page titles; if you want to have each page with a separate title you need to be sure the title tags are left on each page. </p>
<p>Bret</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.bretglassett.com/blog/php-includes-for-non-developers/comment-page-1#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretglassett.com/blog/?p=26#comment-85</guid>
		<description>hi great article, i have a question though.. should i keep the meta description in every file along with the title tag or is it ok to put meta descriptions, tags and everything else in the header.php?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi great article, i have a question though.. should i keep the meta description in every file along with the title tag or is it ok to put meta descriptions, tags and everything else in the header.php?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.bretglassett.com/blog/php-includes-for-non-developers/comment-page-1#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretglassett.com/blog/?p=26#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear this helped Lbug!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear this helped Lbug!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lbug</title>
		<link>http://www.bretglassett.com/blog/php-includes-for-non-developers/comment-page-1#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Lbug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bretglassett.com/blog/?p=26#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that, I think my site is desperately in need of this - it&#039;s a killer having to update every single page individually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that, I think my site is desperately in need of this &#8211; it&#8217;s a killer having to update every single page individually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
